Neighbourhood Profile
Tower Hamlets
Everything here is catchment-weighted — it reflects where your patients live, not your practice’s own counts.
Deprivation & equity: where this catchment sits
Rank against borough siblings on the deprivation this catchment's registered patients actually live with, then see which held metrics move with that local gradient.
Where this catchment sits
Catchment-weighted IoD2025 average score — higher means more deprived · catchment Apr 2026
Weighted by where each practice’s registered patients actually live (GP-registered LSOA catchment × IoD2025), not by the practice postcode.
Which held metrics track the deprivation gradient here
Correlation of each metric with catchment deprivation across this borough's practices
r is the Pearson correlation across this borough’s member practices (n shown per row). A negative r means the metric is lower in more-deprived catchments; positive means higher. This is a practice-level (ecological) relationship — a property of practices, not of individual patients. We report r, n and direction only — no significance test. With fewer than five practices a result is flagged indicative.
Given your population, where are you ahead / behind
For each held metric we compare the actual result to what this catchment's deprivation and registered age would predict. The gap (residual) shows where you out- or under-perform relative to your population — not relative to a flat national average.
Where you're ahead / behind, given your population
Actual result vs what your catchment deprivation & registered age would predict (residual)
Same metric, across the borough
Recorded diabetes prevalence: residual (actual − expected) per practice
“Expected”is a model, not a target — and it runs entirely on data we already hold. For each metric we fit an ordinary least-squares regression of the metric on each practice’s catchment-weighted IoD2025 deprivation and its registered %65+, across 6,142 English practices, then read off what a practice with thiscatchment’s deprivation and age profile would typically achieve. The residualis the actual result minus that expectation: a fair, like-for-like view that doesn’t penalise a practice for serving a more-deprived or older list, and is not a flat national average.
Model used here: catchment deprivation (age added nothing measurable here). Where deprivation does not vary enough to model, the expected value degrades transparently to the plain average. It is a modelled estimate (labelled as such), not a “feed required” item — no new data is needed to compute it.